Unsupported Browser

Ellii may not function properly in Internet Explorer. We recommend using Google Chrome or Firefox instead.

Unsupported Browser

Ellii may not function properly in older browsers. We recommend updating yours to the latest version for the best experience.

Relative Pronouns – Formality Scales

May 15, 2014

Who uses whom?

Last week’s post was all about Adjective Clauses (aka Relative Clauses)—the two types and their punctuation rules. This week, I thought I’d focus on another aspect of adjective clauses which can cause confusion for students: choosing which pronoun to use. Sometimes there are four or five choices for one sentence!

When students are presented with all the relative pronoun options, they can get a bit overwhelmed. I’ve found that presenting them on a scale of formality really helps to clear things up. For simplicity, the scales show restrictive adjective clauses where the relative pronoun is the object of the clause—that way, students can see the most options. Notes on changes for non-restrictive clauses and subject pronouns are included below the scales.

People

more formal whom The man whom I met yesterday was kind.
who The man who I met yesterday was kind.
that The man that I met yesterday was kind.
less formal The man I met yesterday was kind.

Who, that, or (no pronoun) are all very common when the relative pronoun is the object of the adjective clause (i.e., there is another noun or pronoun—“I” in the examples above—following the relative pronoun). I usually suggest using who or that when writing and dropping the pronoun when speaking.

Point out to students that when the relative pronoun is the subject of the adjective clause, there are only two options: who or that, with who being slightly more formal than that. We cannot drop the pronoun when it’s the subject of the clause. (E.g., The man who called me was a telemarketer and The man that called me was a telemarketer are the only correct options).

Should we teach students to use whom? It’s very formal and not so common these days, but I believe we should at least point it out to students, making sure to tell them that it’s rarely used in speaking or writing (unless the writing is quite formal) but that they may come across it while reading. Don’t forget to mention that whom is only possible when it’s the object pronoun in the adjective clause—it’s never possible as the subject pronoun. (E.g., we can say The person whom I talked to at the meeting finally called me but we can’t say The person whom called me was a telemarketer. There must be another noun or pronoun following whom.)

Things

more formal which The book which I read yesterday was good.
that The book that I read yesterday was good.
less formal The book I read yesterday was good.

For restrictive clauses like the examples above (i.e., no commas are used), which is more formal and not often used in Canadian and American English. In British English, it’s still fairly common. In Canadian and American English, that is more acceptable for restrictive clauses, while which is the better choice for non-restrictive clauses (e.g., The Hobbit, which was a great book, was made into a movie.) See Restrictive & Non-Restrictive Adjective Clauses for more information. For restrictive clauses, I usually suggest using that when writing and dropping the pronoun when speaking.

Point out to students that when the relative pronoun is the subject of the adjective clause, there are only two options: which or that, with which being more formal than that (and not commonly used in restrictive clauses). We cannot drop the pronoun when it’s the subject of the clause. (E.g., The book that was on sale was recommended to me is the best option in Canadian and American English).

Places

more formal in which The city in which I live is beautiful.
which The city which I live in is beautiful.
where The city where I live is beautiful.
that The city that I live in is beautiful.
less formal The city I live in is beautiful.

For other adjective clauses involving places, times, etc., putting the preposition before the pronoun is very formal. As with whom, I’d tell my students not to do that (except possibly in very formal writing) but I’d mention that they might see it when reading.

The other pronouns are all commonly used. It’s hard to classify where and when on the formality scale—they can be used for both formal and informal situations. For these cases, I usually suggest using where/when or that when writing and dropping the pronoun when speaking. Note that these pronouns are always the object of the clause, never the subject.

Practice

Not an Ellii member?

Get unlimited access to 1,000+ lessons and 3,000+ flashcards.

Sign Up

Comments (15)

Arthur M.(Teacher)

Absolutely helpful !! Thanks heaps.

Reply to Comment

Lei Kayanuma(Author)

Thanks for your comment, Arthur! We're happy to help :) Happy teaching!

Nora L.(Teacher)

Nice and simple! Easy to teach! I will make Google Slides using your way of teaching. Then I can always put it in a NearPod with activities.
Thanks!

Reply to Comment

Tanya Trusler(Author)

I'm happy to hear this, Nora! Thanks for sharing your presentation methods too.

Silvia P.(Teacher)

Thanks! A simple and clear way to explain it! Love it!

Reply to Comment

Tanya Trusler(Author)

That's great to hear, Silvia! Happy teaching!

Andreani O.(Teacher)

I would like to send it to students. Is it possible?

Reply to Comment

Tanya Trusler(Author)

Hi Andreani, since you're an Ellii subscriber, you will find the information on relative pronouns and formality in the digital tasks of the Adjective Clauses lesson (in the Grammar Practice Worksheets section).You can assign task 1, Grammar Notes, to your students, along with the related tasks.

Here's the link: https://app.ellii.com/lesson/1612-adjective-clauses

Maksym P.(Teacher)

I find it a tad confusing to explain the difference between the object and subject entities being described by the adjective clause.

Take this sentence 'The man who called me was a telemarketer'. The 'Who' here is a relative pronoun and it functions as the subject, and 'called' is the predicate of this adjective clause. Here we must use a relative pronoun to build an adjective clause. This one is clear.

In this informal example 'The city I live in is beautiful.' we omit the relative pronoun. So, with relative pronoun missing 'city' becomes the object of the sentence.

My question is if the sentence 'The city that I live in is beautiful.' has the relative pronoun 'that' or the noun 'city' as the object? Put differently, I'd like to know if 'that' in the latter example is actually a relative pronoun functioning as the object here, or it is 'city' that is the object?

Reply to Comment

Tanya Trusler(Author)

Hi Maksym, it can be confusing for sure. To me, though, there are two distinct sentences: 1) The city is beautiful (where "city" is the subject) and 2) I live in the city (where "city" is the object of the preposition). Combined in the relative clause "that I live in," "that" is now the object (of the preposition) in this clause. Even if we drop "that," "the city" doesn't become the new object. In both cases (with or without "that"), the relative clause contains a subject ("I"), a verb ("live"), and a preposition ("in") or preposition phrase ("in that"). In both cases, "that" or the "empty object" refer to the city, of course, but they don't replace the subject of the independent clause. In both cases, "the city" is only the subject of the independent clause (The city is beautiful). Hope that helps clear things up!

Maksym P.(Teacher)

Tanya, thank you for your time explaining this.

Just to recap if I understood it properly: this sentence 'The book I read yesterday was good.' doesn't have any object, but it's implied (empty object). However, if we break down the whole complex sentence into two clauses, the first clause will be 'I read a book yesterday' and the second clause will be 'The book was good'; here the clause 'I read a book yesterday' does have an object 'a book', and that's how we understand we are actually describing an object by an adjective clause.

Reply to Comment

Tanya Trusler(Author)

No problem at all, Maksym! The first part is right (the adjective clause's object, the book, is dropped/empty). But as for the second part, just note that you're describing the subject of the main clause, not the object ("the book" is the subject of "The book I read yesterday was good."). It might help to think of the function of an adjective clause. Its function is the same as an adjective: to describe a noun. That noun can be a subject or object. So in this sentence: "The book I read yesterday was good," the adjective clause describes/modifies the subject of the main clause (the book), whereas in this sentence: "I really enjoyed the book I read yesterday," the adjective clause describes/modifies the object of the main clause (the book). Hope that helps!

Maksym P.(Teacher)

If I say that this adjective clause "...I read yesterday..." describes the subject 'the book' of the main clause in "The book I read yesterday was good", and, at the same time 'the book' is also the object (which is actually omitted in the given adjective clause) of the adjective clause, will it be correct? Perhaps, it is not grammatically correct since 'the book' is not a part of the adjective clause, but can it possibly make sense to call 'the book' an object of the adjective clause to make it simpler for students?

Thank you!

Reply to Comment

Tanya Trusler(Author)

I wouldn't do that because I think it would cause more confusion for students. This is how I would explain it:
- I would write this sentence on the board: The book I read yesterday was good.
- Then I would say/write the following: The main clause is "The book (S) was good."
- The original sentence for the adjective clause is "The read the book (O) yesterday."
- The adjective clause always follows the noun it modifies, so the full sentence is "The book I read yesterday was good" and the adjective clause is "I read yesterday." At this point I would underline "I read yesterday" and draw an arrow to "The book."
- I would also remind them that the relative pronoun is "that" and "that" is the object of the adjective clause and it refers to "the book." Then I would remind them that when the relative pronoun in an adjective clause is an object, it's often dropped in informal speaking and writing. We can never do this if the relative pronoun is functioning as a subject.

So to answer your question, I wouldn't call "the book" the object of the adjective clause. I think this would be more confusing for students. It is the underlying meaning, but in that sentence the object is dropped (so there is no object at all as written), and the only instance of "the book" is as the subject of the main clause. Hope that helps!

Maksym P.(Teacher)

Thank you Tanya, I will follow your advice.

Reply to Comment
Leave a Comment

Log In to Comment Reply

or
Comment Reply as a Guest
  • **bold**_italics_> quote

    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Thinking of joining Ellii?

    Complete this form to create an account and stay up to date on all the happenings here at Ellii.