Unsupported Browser

Ellii may not function properly in Internet Explorer. We recommend using Google Chrome or Firefox instead.

Unsupported Browser

Ellii may not function properly in older browsers. We recommend updating yours to the latest version for the best experience.

Forming the Possessive of Words Ending in -s

August 14, 2024

Editor's Note:

This blog post was originally written a decade ago, but there is still a heated debate between those who prefer adding only an apostrophe to a singular noun that ends in -s (e.g., Dickens' book) and those who prefer "apostrophe s" (e.g., Dickens's book). Recently The Associated Press (AP) published an article on this ongoing argument about how to style the possessive form of Vice President Kamala Harris. While everyone agrees that the possessive form of her running mate, Governor Tim Walz, is Walz's, the argument for Harris' vs. Harris's persists.

Which side do you agree with: AP (Harris') or others such as the The Chicago Manual of Style, The New York Times, and Ellii (Harris's)? You can watch the video below and/or read the following original post to see why Ellii chooses the latter. In fact, we update any AP articles in our That's News to Me section into our own house style so that we don't confuse students any further. If only all style guides could agree!

Original Post

(from April 17, 2014)

“Apostrophe s” (’s) is used for several reasons in English, such as for the contracted form of is and has, and also for indicating possession (belonging to someone). In general, we add ’s to a singular noun and add to a plural noun ending in ‑s. For example, we would say the student’s book (for one student) and the students’ classroom (for many students). 

But what happens when the singular noun ends in ‑s? The rules for this have gone back and forth, which makes it difficult for both ELLs (English language learners) and speakers whose first language is English. As an editor, I have to keep up with the current guidelines as set out by popular style guides such as The Chicago Manual of Style. I thought I’d share the most recent “rules” with you so you can pass them along to your students! If you disagree with any of these guidelines, please share your opinion in the comment section below—it’s always interesting to learn what different teachers think around the world!

General Rules

1. Add ’s (apostrophe + s) to a singular noun

  • the student’s book

2. Add ’ (apostrophe only) to a plural noun ending in -s

  • the students classroom
Note

If the plural noun doesn’t end in ‑s, then simply add ’s to the word.

  • the children’s classroom

Rule for Singular Words Ending in ‑s

Add ’s (apostrophe + s) to a singular noun that ends in -s

  • the class’s door
  • Kansas’s laws
  • Dickens’s stories

According to The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th edition, the general rule for forming possessives also applies to words ending in -s (sections 7.15–7.19). This rule applies to both common nouns and proper nouns (including names ending in -s, -x, and -z), as well as letters and numbers. Here are a few more examples from The Chicago Manual of Style:

  • a bass’s stripes
  • Marx’s theories
  • Borges’s library
  • Berlioz’s works
  • FDR’s legacy
  • 1999’s heaviest snowstorm
  • the Lincolns’ marriage (plural of the last name “Lincoln”)
  • the Williamses’ new house (plural of the last name “Williams”)

The Chicago Manual of Style also explains that nowadays, unlike in previous years, words ending in unpronounced -s and proper classical names of two or more syllables that end in an "eeze" sound also follow the same rules, as noted in the following examples:

  • Descartes’s three dreams
  • the Ganges’s source

Basically, this is great news for us all because the same rules apply to almost every situation and are therefore easier to remember. English learners are always relieved when there aren’t a lot of exceptions to a rule!

Not an Ellii member?

Get unlimited access to 1,000+ lessons and 3,000+ flashcards.

Sign Up

Comments (10)

Tara Benwell(Author)

Very useful post, Tanya. I know I've bugged you about this before. So, it's grammatically correct to add '-es' to a proper name when forming a possessive, like in 'the Williamses' new house' case, right? Is this because of pronunciation?

Reply to Comment

Tanya Trusler(Author)

Thanks, Tara! Yes, we need to add '-es' to names that end in -s, -z, -x, -sh, or
-ch. You're correct that this reflects how we pronounce 's' after these sounds---we need to add another syllable in order to be able to pronounce two sibilant sounds back to back.

Compare my last name, Trusler (which doesn't end in those sounds), with the name 'Martinez', which ends in -z.
- Tanya Trusler's home (one person) / The Truslers' home (my whole family)
- Maria Martinez's home (one person) / The Martinezes' home (her whole family)

Don't forget that the plural proper noun will not always be possessive! Consider these examples:
- Let's invite the Truslers to the party.
- Let's invite the Martinezes to the party.

You can tell it needs a possessive apostrophe or apostrophe 's' if it's followed by another noun ('home' in the above examples) and means 'belonging to someone' (i.e., the Martinezes own the home, so it's 'the Martinezes' home').

Hope that helps! :)

John C.(Teacher)

Thank you! This was useful as an urgent quick lesson for my online students! Well summarized! :)

Reply to Comment

Tanya Trusler(Author)

I'm glad it was useful for you and your students, John! Thanks for commenting.

Malcolm Brown(Guest)

“Chicago” has it right: if the noun is singular always add ‘s, even if the word ends in s or z. Keep it simple.

Reply to Comment

Tanya Trusler(Author)

I completely agree, Malcolm! Simple is best.

Jenefer H.(Teacher)

Thanks a lot for this information.

Reply to Comment

Tanya Trusler(Author)

You're welcome, Jenefer! Hope it was useful.

Tara Benwell(Author)

Thanks for updating this great post a decade later, Tanya!

It's fun to see grammar making headline news. I wonder if AP will switch to "Harris's" now? That would be easier on our Ellii materials writers and editors! I guess we are a "modern" organization.

I was surprised to learn that Merriam Webster still feels that Walz' is acceptable since it is a name that ends in an "s" or "z" sound. I saw that mentioned on Twitter and in The New York Times article. They do say that Walz's is more common. Does anyone still add just an apostrophe after "z"?

Reply to Comment

Tanya Trusler(Author)

Thanks, Tara! This was a fun update to make. I love when grammar is trending! It's fascinating to me to see language evolve. I feel like AP might end up switching to "Harris's" eventually since many other style guides have gone that route. To me, s' indicates a plural form, so I much prefer s's (even if it looks a little weird!).

I'm also surprised that MW said that Walz' is acceptable. I'm glad they mentioned that Walz's is more common because I feel like that's definitely the case. MW does present language as used, so if they say that Walz' is acceptable, then it must still be used by some. I have a strong feeling that that will change one day too, though.

Leave a Comment

Log In to Comment Reply

or
Comment Reply as a Guest
  • **bold**_italics_> quote

    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Thinking of joining Ellii?

    Complete this form to create an account and stay up to date on all the happenings here at Ellii.